BETABiohacksAI is a research tool for informational purposes only. All outputs are computational hypothesis candidates — not confirmed mechanisms, not medical advice, and not a substitute for professional medical judgment. Independent experimental validation is always required.
BiohacksAI is an evolving scientific literature platform. New compounds and evidence are indexed continuously.
B
MOLECULAR TARGET

EBAG9

EBAG9

29 compounds · BiohacksAI corpus v20260307-01

29
compounds
Compounds
29
Gene Symbol
EBAG9
NCBI Gene

Looking for compounds that interact with EBAG9?

View all 29 compounds →
About EBAG9

EBAG9 (EBAG9) is a biological target studied in biomedical research. The BiohacksAI corpus identifies 29 compounds with documented interactions with this target, based on BindingDB assay data and PubMed literature.

Compounds Targeting EBAG9 (29)
1
Glycine Max
1.00
confidence
2
Glycyrrhiza Uralensis
1.00
confidence
3
Panax Notoginseng
1.00
confidence
4
Salvia Miltiorrhiza
1.00
confidence
5
Sanguisorba Officinalis
1.00
confidence
498
studies
1.00
confidence
7
Achyranthes Bidentata
0.50
confidence
500
studies
0.50
confidence
9
Aloe Vera
0.50
confidence
10
Aquilaria Sinensis
0.50
confidence
199
studies
0.50
confidence
12
Belamcanda Chinensis
0.50
confidence
13
Bupleurum Chinense
0.50
confidence
14
Coix Lacryma
0.50
confidence
15
Ephedra Sinica
0.50
confidence
16
Epimedium Brevicornum
0.50
confidence
17
Eucommia Ulmoides
0.50
confidence
18
Forsythia Suspensa
0.50
confidence
19
Fritillaria Cirrhosa
0.50
confidence
20
Lonicera Japonica
0.50
confidence
300
studies
0.50
confidence
22
Polygala Tenuifolia
0.50
confidence
23
Poria Cocos
0.50
confidence
24
Prunus Mume
0.50
confidence
25
Scutellaria Baicalensis
0.50
confidence
26
Sophora Flavescens
0.50
confidence
27
Sophora Tonkinensis
0.50
confidence
28
Trichosanthes Kirilowii
0.50
confidence
29
Vigna Radiata
0.50
confidence
Top 29 compounds by confidence score. Derived from BindingDB assay data.
Data Source
Corpusv20260307-01
SourceBindingDB · ChEMBL · PubMed

All data is computationally derived from published research. Not medical advice. Independent validation required.